All Q Drops – Part 191: The Bin Laden Play. Maintain Slavery at All Costs. Red Carpet Rollout? No, We’ll Have FREEDOM.

Help Spread the Word

Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Hitting the re-TRUTH button on TRUTH Social is the best way you can make an impact and help get this message out! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. You can find me @PatriotsInProgress. Thank you!

How this Works

For each publication, I will review at least one Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.  

Drops #1250 and #1251 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q re-posts drop #1249 in drop #1250. Q asks when Bin Laden was reported as killed in Pakistan and clarifies the date as May 2, 2011. Q asks some follow up questions regarding the exact location. On that day, Obama addressed the nation stating, “the United States has conducted an operation that killed Osama bin Laden.” “Today, at my direction, the United States launched a targeted operation against that compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan” (http://tinyurl.com/yn33srkd). Regarding proximity, the only thing I found of note was Abbottabad houses the Pakistani Military Academy. Q tells Anons to think logically and follow the timeline as it relates to when the Awan brother’s mission went green, which Q clarifies was 2004. Q asks what happened regarding Huma, Valerie Jaret, Awan, and 3 others during this timeframe, which was the theft of classified data, per previous discussions (recall how it all tied back to Pakistan).

Q provides a link to H.R.5734, introduced to Congress on May 10, 2012, which can be cited as the Pakistan Terrorism Accountability Act of 2012. The document focuses on the Pakistan’s support of radical groups in the area (specifically the Haqqani network), provides a timeline of terrorist activity that extends back to January 2008, and suggests that “of the amounts made available for assistance to Pakistan for fiscal year 2013 or any subsequent fiscal year, the President shall withhold $50,000,000 for each United States citizen who is killed as a result of actions of Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) or support provided by the ISI to other organizations or individuals” (http://tinyurl.com/bde68p6y).

Next, Q provides a link to H.R.1699, introduced to Congress on May 4, 2011, which can be cited as the Pakistan Foreign Aid Accountability Act. Q emphasizes the Secretary of State, who at the time was none other than Hillary. The document “prohibits assistance from being provided to Pakistan unless the Secretary of State certifies to Congress that: (1) the government of Pakistan did not have any information regarding Osama bin Laden's possible whereabouts on or after September 11, 2001; or (2) if the government of Pakistan did have information regarding Osama bin Laden's possible whereabouts on or after September 11, 2001, it expeditiously communicated such information to the U.S government” (http://tinyurl.com/47644t86).

Therefore, under the language of these bills, we can tell that Pakistan was receiving a substantial amount of aid (conditions placed were on the order of millions of dollars) and the Secretary of State would have the ability to protect funding by certifying on behalf of Pakistan they did not have any knowledge of Bin Laden’s whereabouts. While neither document was passed in the Congress or Senate, they provide insight into the desired agenda of the Deep State, provide some details about various timeline elements, and indicate the Bin Laden event was used as a catalyst (which Q will suggest next). Q asks if aid was cut off in 2010 and asks if it was coincidence considering what all happened in 2011. If you dig, you can find that aid was not cut off in 2010, but $300 million in military aid was withheld due to concerns over the country's commitment to fighting terrorism.

Looking at this from a public narrative perspective, keeping in mind what we know about the Arab Spring in Egypt (2011) and the rise of ISIS in the region (~2014), the US was “applying pressure” to Pakistan regarding their support of terrorism and Pakistan responded by “providing Bin Laden” as evidence to the contrary. Regardless, the Deep State agenda was very much active behind the scenes. Q provides a link to an article from July 2011 that further describes the public narratives that were being crafted. “The Obama administration has announced it will withhold more than one-third of all military assistance to Pakistan” (http://tinyurl.com/48dapynk). If interested, the article provides details of the more than 60 years of aid to the nation.

Lastly, Q asks Anons to define exchange, which is “to give in return for something received; trade,” “to give and receive reciprocally; interchange,” or “to give up for a substitute.” Q requesting this definition, in the context of what was discussed, further indicates the Bin Laden event was a false flag (i.e. event crafted and carried out to support a larger political agenda), acting to build a public narrative (e.g. we are fighting terrorism), while protecting Deep State actions behind the scenes (e.g. rise of ISIS). As always, I will let you decide. Q re-provides the iconic video titled “This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected” in drop #1251 and re-instructs Anons to listen carefully to the words. I encourage you to do the same today.

Drop #1252 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q provides two memes in drop #1252. The first contains the photos of Hillary and Robert Byrd that were provided in drop #638 and adds a 2008 Hillary quote where she professes that she sought out his guidance from her very first day in the Senate and continued to do so as Secretary of State. The second meme is a fact sheet, like the one provided in drop #639 (excludes Obamacare). Q tells Anons it was time to learn the truth (i.e. the larger population). This time Q focuses on the changing of history by asking why the Deep State was attempting to remove slavery. This is multi-faceted but can be largely summarized in a few high-level points. One, by removing the history of slavery the Deep State could more easily re-implement its practices through different means (e.g. global slavery through fiat currency). Without a prior example to compare it to, people have less opportunity to ask questions and seek change. Two, by removing the history of slavery the Deep State could re-brand themselves by eliminating the baggage and continuously lying about their history. Before long, people would have no evidence to the contrary and they could eventually outlast or eliminate anyone who remembered the true history.

Q continues by asking questions that highlight the explicit push to re-write history books, use activist groups (e.g. BLM, Antifa), and use teachers (e.g. critical race theory, social justice) to destroy the truth and replace it with false narratives. Q provides the phrase, “Republicans are racist,” as an example and emphasizes it was [projection]. Q re-iterates the push was to ensure the mass population remained in a state of brainwashing, allowing the Deep State to divide, control, and enslave them. As we have discussed, we live inside of a slave system, each tending our own slave garden, and few recognize this as an open-air prison painted with the illusion of freedom. A while back, GMONEY and I had a great discussion with Pastor Coin about the Bible, God’s warning about how slavery would manifest, and compared that to our current system. I encourage you to take a listen if you haven’t already (http://tinyurl.com/47vxhkd9).

Q continues by asking what the Democrats and Republicans had done for the black population. While Q was specifically discussing the actions in the public narrative (i.e. Democrats further oppressed, and Republicans lessened oppression), I want to be clear that most of the players in these buckets were part of the Deep State and were equally working towards the global enslavement of all people, regardless of public narrative (i.e. actions speak louder than words). Q highlights that Trump was markedly different, as evidenced by his track record. Q further highlights how Deep State players (e.g. Pelosi) would select elements (e.g. MLK) and use repetition (e.g. mention in 74% of weekly addresses) to [project] that they had morals, were doing the right thing, and ultimately re-write history.

Q states that MLK was a conservative and tells Anons to learn the TRUTH. “It is time for conservatives to lay claim to the legacy of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. King was no stalwart Conservative, yet his core beliefs, such as the power and necessity of faith-based association and self-government based on absolute truth and moral law, are profoundly conservative. Modern liberalism rejects these ideas, while conservatives place them at the center of their philosophy. Despite decades of its appropriation by liberals, King's message was fundamentally conservative” (http://tinyurl.com/bdeth699). Q ends the drop by emphasizing Patriots have no skin color. Remember, TOGETHER we are STRONG and APART we are WEAK. We must unite under one banner, regardless of the past and current narratives, and fight for OUR freedom. I believe this is simply done by opting out with and learning about Bitcoin. The Bitcoin network is egalitarian, which is “affirming, promoting, or characterized by belief in equal political, economic, social, and civil rights for all people.” WWG1WGA!

Drops #1253 through #1256 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q provides two links in drop #1253. The first link is a December 13, 2016, News Release from Chuck Grassley’s website discussing his investigation referral for Planned Parenthood. “Following an investigation into the practice of fetal tissue transfers and the federal laws governing the practice, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley is referring several Planned Parenthood affiliates and companies involved in fetal tissue transfers, as well as the Planned Parenthood Federation of America, to the FBI and the Department of Justice for investigation and possible prosecution” (http://tinyurl.com/y3r6xkyz). As I have gone down the rabbit hole, have sat with the content, and have seen various stories “re-play” from time to time, often with increased frequency, I am confident much of what was done was a de-legitimizing operation against the Deep State and their system through repeated exposure.

While I believe justice will come in many forms as we move forward, especially for those at the top, I believe many of the events we saw (on both sides), the narratives associated with them, the investigations performed, and the resulting actions we saw, served as a continual awakening of the population. This process undoubtedly continues to this day, as evidenced by re-surfacing of stories like Epstein through the partial document releases and the continual hoax accusations / trials against Trump. Ultimately, if people all must converge on the same point, but everyone starts their awakening process at a different point (e.g. some still sleeping but will awaken), the repetitive nature is necessary. Always remember, not everything you see is [for you]. It was before you learned about it, but now you should be continually pressing into new understanding with other things you have not come to terms with (e.g. Bitcoin).  

The second link is a December 7, 2017, Fox News article on covering later results of the Grassley actions. “The Justice Department has launched a federal investigation into Planned Parenthood’s practices and the sale of fetal tissue.” “Justice Department Assistant Attorney General for Legislative Affairs Stephen Boyd formally requested unredacted documents from the Senate Judiciary Committee, the same panel that led the congressional probe into the women’s health organization” (http://tinyurl.com/yc59pkcz). Q ends the drop with the signature “coming soon,” indicating the topic would remain in the news and would see new developments.

Q reminds Anons about Iran in drop #1254, emphasizes the future proves past marker, and instructs them to re-read drop #1241, which we discussed last publication. Next, Q points to Trump actions on April 24, 2018, specifically the phrases “mark it down” and “bigger problems than ever before,” and indicates they were signals sent to the Deep State. During my digging I was unable to match these exact phrases but was able to find statements that closely match, from a joint press conference between French President Macron and Trump occurring that day. During the conference, Trump discusses the horrible nature of the Iran deal, highlighting the provision of $150 Billion and $1.8 Million in cash (in “barrels” and “boxes”), alludes to future actions / changes, and emphasizes the pressure campaign would continue (i.e. FAFO). As for the similar statements, Trump stated “We’re going to see what happens on the 12^th” (which I can see as “mark it down”) and “If Iran threatens us, in any way, they will pay a price like few countries have ever paid” (which I can see as “bigger problems than ever before.” These statements occur back-to-back. As always, I will let you decide. Q ends the drop by emphasizing various elements of drop #1241 we discussed last time and tells the Deep State, “Sweet Dreams.”

Q responds to an Anon in drop #1255. The Anon asks Q if Macron was a true ally to POTUS. This question comes from the verbal statements and body language (handshakes / hugs) in the video above. Q responds to the Anon by stating his sole purpose for the white house visit was to convince Trump, on behalf of the EU, to remain in the Iran Deal. Note that Q includes WH visit in the kill box, which emphasizes that Trump forced him to travel many miles to meet (i.e. on Trump’s terms – which had no ultimate effect to the resulting outcome). Q ends the drop by telling the Anon it was their decision what to believe between those two data points (i.e. what they saw / what was said and what Q provided).

Q re-posts drop #1255 in drop #1256 and asks what was at stake for the opposing side. Q indicates the total was on the order of $500 Billion per year and emphasizes that the taxpayers had no idea (i.e. actions veiled by narrative, payments through currency creation (i.e. inflation) vs. explicit taxation (i.e. explicit line items agreed to by votes that count – neither of which exist). Q ends the drop by sarcastically asking why the good work in North Korea wasn’t receiving praise around the world by the Deep State and their legacy media apparatus. As we have discussed, elimination / de-nuclearization was both antithetical to their agenda and removed the demand. Q ends the drop by stating “we endure,” which I am confident each of us have personally felt throughout this journey as we have continued to fight the good fight against all opposition and being called crazy for many years without knowing when it will end.

Drops #1257 through #1259 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q re-posts drop #1256 in drop #1257 and emphasizes the actions in North Korea represented a hostage being freed. As we have discussed, this has multiple meanings regarding the North Koreans as a black site and the entire world from the narratives / threats of (i.e. fear) and potentiality for nuclear conflict. Q responds to an Anon in drop #1258. The Anon re-posts drop #1256 two times and asks when we would have the Mother of All Booms (MOAB). Q provides a very important response as it relates to how this war is waged and how to identify clickbait, misguided people, trolls, and bad actors. Q asks the Anon if Trump and the Patriots should tell everyone the day and time. To double down, Q asks the Anon if Trump and the Patriots should roll out the red carpet (i.e. welcome the enemy to the front door). Q ends the drop by telling the Anon to think logically and reminds them the world is watching, which includes both good and bad actors.

Q responds to an Anon in drop #1259. The Anon re-posts drop #1257 and states Trump deserves a Nobel Peace Prize for his work. Q provides a very important response as it relates to motivations and incentives. Q tells the Anon we are all in this together (i.e. WWG1WGA) and emphasizes the motivations and incentives had nothing to do with fame. Fundamentally, the notion of receiving a Nobel Piece Prize is meaningless as the entire system, including credentialism, is being upended and replaced with a new system of opposing incentives. A while back I wrote a piece on Badlands Substack that included discussion about the underlying incentives of this war (http://tinyurl.com/58sdbw76).

Q ends the drop by providing the correct motivations and incentives which are taking back our FREEDOM (i.e. personal sovereignty) and saving our children from the various forms of abuse (e.g. brainwashing, mutilation, trafficking) from the EVIL that has enslaved the world for so very long. I will emphasize that the underlying root cause of the enslavement is the monetary system. Therefore, the underlying solution must address the monetary system. Not only that, but it must also do so in a way that ensures the same cycle cannot be repeated again a few generations down the line as those of us who fight pass on the baton through a metaphorical game of telephone. [This] is why we Bitcoin. It is about the [BREAK].

If you have made it to the end, congratulations! I hope you have had a wonderful week. For my perspective on current events and how they relate to the Q drops, please watch Eye of the Storm and Rugpull Radio on Badlands Media! Things are absolutely wild right now with no indications it will slow down anytime soon! Please show your support by subscribing and sharing the content. Hodl the line, relinquish nothing, advance when possible! God Bless, Patriots!

• Catch up on the latest Rugpull Radio episodes!

• Catch up on the latest Eye of the Storm episodes!

1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”

Fair Use Notice: This publication / video contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.

Patriots in Progress is my "opinion." Anything said by me, or my guests is either opinion, criticism, information, or commentary. This content is not financial advice. I encourage you to use this as a starting point to do / continue your own research.