Part 40: Game Theory – How Do You Fight the Deep State from Within Their System?

Help Spread the Word

Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. Thank you!

How this Works

For each publication, I will review one or more Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.  

Drop #96 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q responds to an Anon in drop #96. The Anon had posted a link to an article that described the provision of $221 million to Palestine, by Obama, in his last days before office. “The Associated Press reported Monday that former President Barack Obama released $221 million in U.S. funding for the Palestinian Authority on the morning of Friday, January 20 — just hours before he was to leave office.” “More than $227 million in foreign affairs funding was released at the time, including $4 million for climate change programs and $1.25 million for U.N. organizations.” (https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2017/01/23/report-obama-gave-221-million-palestinians-last-hours/). The Anon references this as the “payout” (remember Hillary had made many promises and had gotten many donations with the promise she would win and provide payback). Q responds by stating that asking questions (which drives additional questioning, research, critical thinking, discussion, etc.) to helps connect the dots is the entire point of the Q drop operation.

To use Q’s metaphors, Anons are to take the crumbs (information / questions) Q provides in the drops, dig for the sauce (evidence), bake something with the ingredients (put it all together and come up with sound conclusions), and then share the meal with others (red pill via a variety of ways, but especially simple graphics / memes). Q acknowledges that not everything would make sense right away, but would over time, and tells Anons that it was our job to get the word out when it did. Q states that time stamps will help validate authenticity. For example, as we have discussed, sometimes we will have an event occur around a 1, 2, etc. “year delta” (anniversary) from when Q coincidentally dropping information around the event / players. The following is a recent example of this occurring. I personally consider the large collection of these as Q proofs. I have simply seen too many, and will share those I can recall, to say that it is all a coincidence. These are Q proofs! Lastly, Q indicates that Trump needed the help of Anons to spread the word and bring about exposure / transparency and ends the post with “everything stated is for a reason.”

Drop #97 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q begins drop #97 by asking Anons to define “Game Theory,” which is defined as “the branch of mathematics concerned with the analysis of strategies for dealing with competitive situations where the outcome of a participant's choice of action depends critically on the actions of other participants. Game theory has been applied to contexts in war, business, and biology.” This can also be equated to decision or utility theory. I have some experience with this subject through my education and my application of the concepts to real life in my career (often theoretical application via critical thinking and strategy development / implementation as a Sr. Leader, using what I learned about those concepts as a piece of the foundation / framework to strengthen my approach and resiliency).

While studying for my graduate degree I took a course on decision making and utility theory. The class was all about taking real life situations and breaking them down into decision tress, assigning both probability and expected value to the different branches, and ultimately solving the problem to know what path you should take based on maximum utility (lowest risk of unfavorable outcomes or loss). However, as the definition says, each decision / outcome is potentially partially or completely out of your control and made by other players as the situation plays out. Therefore, you can utilize these models to pre-determine, if an unfavorable outcome were to occur during the chain of events, what your preferred countermeasure to recover / maximize utility would be from that point forward (i.e. your plan b, plan c, etc.). Another very important area of study within game theory are the various psychological biases that exist, how they present themselves, how they can be triggered, and how they can be leveraged to enhance your decision making and hinder the decision making of your opponent. All these factors can dramatically change the outcome of a decision tree, especially if they are not discovered beforehand and result in different probabilities or expected value than you had predicted. A few of these biases are “self-serving bias, authority bias, confirmation bias, framing bias, overconfidence bias, anchoring bias, availability bias, conformity bias, feature positive effect, etc” (https://www.indeed.com/career-advice/career-development/decision-making-biases#:~:text=1%20Self-serving%20bias.%20A%20self-serving%20bias%20is%20one,positive%20benefits%20of%20your%20decisions%20versus%20weighing%20). This is why some things don’t make sense in the moment until we realize they were part of a larger decision for more benefit (e.g. Biden has been a great red pill, but we haven’t liked it and still don’t fully understand what is going on). I recommend you do some reading or listening on game theory. It is a fun journey with many examples of simple / semi-complex games to help the concepts make sense.

I believe Q points out game theory because any significant, military strategy to take down the Deep State, especially when the costs are life and death (e.g. JFK assassination), would have invariably been developed over the course of many years and “war gamed” extensively. They would have researched all possible “moves and countermoves” to ensure and maximize success (i.e. you wouldn’t start a war you know you can’t / won’t win). As we have discussed before, the Deep State has created their own System or “game.” They slowly broke the rules of the old game and normalized a game where cheaters win, and honest players lose. That’s not to say there are no rules, just that the rules favor corruption. It’s kind of like the saying “if it weren’t for double standards, the Deep State would have no standards at all.” Ultimately, Trump and the Patriots must fight them from within the corrupt system. The world has been conditioned by the game which has affected their decision making in a way that further promotes the game.

The “Prisoner’s Dilemma” (see diagram below) is a quick example of how game theory in action (https://studiousguy.com/game-theory-examples/#:~:text=Examples%20of%20Game%20Theory%201%20Bidding%20at%20Auction.,in%20the%20stock%20market%20can%20be%20taken%20wisely). Let’s say we arrest two criminals and put them in prison for minor crimes but know that each is involved in worse crimes. The prosecutors have it in their best interest to get each criminal to betray the other and provide evidence that would support the stronger prosecution. Therefore, the prosecutors provide false confidence that they can secure a heavy sentence and provide an incentive (reduced sentence) to each criminal for a betrayal against the other. This puts each prisoner in a tough spot. Mainly because they do not have any information on how the process is going with the other criminal and what their decision making looks like. If neither criminal talk, the prosecution cannot back their false confidence with evidence and each one will receive a lesser sentence for the minor crime. Everyone knows that “snitches get stitches” right? Each criminal invariably thinks the following two thoughts, which further adds to the pressure. One is, “What if the other rats me out and I don’t rat them out? I’ll get a heavier sentence and they will get a reduced sentence.” The other is the opposite of that where they benefit. Ultimately, they both know that a dual betrayal would result in a heavy sentence for both. They couldn’t possibly do that to me, right? I couldn’t possibly do that to them right? So, what does a criminal do? Well, that depends on many other factors (like how each one of them feels they can beat the system, what information each has about the other’s decision making, understanding of bias, etc.), but I believe this illustrates the concept of game theory.  

Next, Q shifts back to the Las Vegas shooting, asking a variety of questions, and requesting a few definitions. One definition is hostage, which is “a person seized or held as security for the fulfillment of a condition.” The other is leverage, which is “the exertion of force by means of a lever or an object used in the manner of a lever.” Q asks a series of questions that indicate that Paddock’s family was potentially being used as hostages to force Paddock into some action(s). This leaves open the possibilities that Paddock may have either been forced to conduct the attack or was simply a fall guy (found dead at the scene, ruled a “suicide”). As for MS-13, I believe it is likely that they were involved in the shooting on the ground and were possibly also holding Paddock’s family hostage. Note, I also believe the three letter agencies (e.g. CIA) were involved, so they may have taken these roles as well, but were likely orchestrating lower level players to achieve the larger objectives. Again, there is not a lot of concrete evidence on this one to confirm what has been indicated. Regardless, I believe the true story will come out as this all unfolds, and the Deep State is exposed. Until then, there is an endless rabbit hole out there on this topic if you are interested further.

Q then shifts focus on General Michael Flynn. However, as I have covered these questions in previous publications, I will skip them for brevity’s sake tonight. Lastly, Q tells the Anons to paint the picture, keeping in mind that disinformation exists and is necessary. Q mentions 10 days of darkness and a war of good versus evil. What I believe is most interesting is how Q ends the drop. Q states that not all the crumbs are for Anons. Some are for both the good and bad players that are watching. Q also states that the drops serve as instructions for those who know how to read them (e.g. Wizard and Warlocks, White Hats, Q Team). This is an important thing to realize about the drops. Since some not all of them are for us, they do not all have to make sense to us. Hence why I review for extractable information and connections and do not get too deep in the speculation.

Drop #98 (https://qalerts.app/):

Drop #98 starts with an updated graphic by an Anon, which added the recent Q drops to the previously provided graphic. Q states the graphic is good and directs the Anons to continue to update and log. Q again stresses the importance of maintaining the graphic and tells us to re-review each sentence after happenings to understand the big picture. Lastly Q states that signatures have meaning. This could mean many things, but I have noticed a few things. One, Q doesn’t always sign the drops with “Q” and others are signed with “Q+” (we will discuss that later). This could potentially mean that there are a few different categories of Q drops based on Q team signature (or lack thereof). Two, Q also often ends the drops with certain phrases, names of movies, etc. (e.g. Snow White, Godfather III, Alice & Wonderland). We already know from looking at Alice & Wonderland that there are likely more than one meaning for each of these phrases / names. Using signatures as a filter / legend to subdivide the drops could provide some useful information, but I’d have to investigate it further to know for sure.  

If you have made it to the end, congratulations! Hope you all had a great start to the week. I met some new Patriots at a group photo op around a “Let’s Go Brandon” sign. It was very cold today, but we had a great time! Looking forward to seeing where God leads everyone. Have a great week. Hold the line! God Bless, Patriots!

1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”