All Q Drops – Part 90: Legacy Media Increases the Assault on the Q Drops / Truth Movement. Q Addresses a Variety of Conspiracy Theories. Stay Focused!
Help Spread the Word
Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Hitting the re-Truth button on Truth Social is the best way you can make an impact and help get this message out! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. You can find me @PatriotsInProgress. Thank you!
How this Works
For each publication, I will review at least one Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.
Drop #375 (https://qalerts.app/):
First, this will be a slightly shorter, yet very interesting publication. We have been blessed to have some great friends visit us from Colorado! Therefore, I have taken some time to enjoy their company.
Q provides two pictures in drop #375. The first is a picture of a Newsweek article. This article clearly highlights the information / narrative war that was actively being waged, “The rhetoric in the media over whether Donald Trump is facing a ‘coup’ due to the special counsel investigation should focus more on whether the president himself would subvert democracy to remain in power, according to Richard Painter, former chief White House ethics lawyer.” (https://bit.ly/3zWPnXd). As is clear in hindsight, the Deep State was terrified that Trump would shut down the Russia Collusion hoax and / or use the military to stage his own coup against them, neither of which was a consideration outside of optics / bluff tactics. Trump knew that the truth would eventually exonerate him in the Russia Collusion hoax. He also knew that he must avoid all negative optics (i.e. perception of a political attack) and could not use the military directly to perform a military coup to stay in power due to public opinion and what would result in civil unrest (nor would he want to – he isn’t the dictator they project him to be). Ultimately, the Deep State was, and would continue to, projecting their intentions of removing Trump using the military, should he remain in office in 2020 (reference Pelosi’s panic before and after the 2020 election, the narrative from the legacy media during this same timeframe, etc.). The Deep State was absolutely planning drag him out of the White House if he did not “lose” or chose not to leave once he “lost.”
The second is a picture of a NY Magazine article that was continuing to paint the Q drops / truth movement (i.e. “the storm” in this article) as a conspiracy theory. This article labels Pizzagate, secret societies, child sex trafficking, and Satanism among the elite as “conspiracy theories” and likens “the storm” to them. The article goes as far as stating that these discussions make “countless logical leaps and paranoid assumptions that fail to hold up under the slightest fact-based scrutiny.” We won’t go into Pizzagate today, but if you do not know what it is, I recommend you review Liz Cronkin’s work on the topic. Sick stuff. As for all other items listed, I believe I have already presented sufficient evidence to debunk the article’s claims wholesale; and we still have many drops and much more to discuss. Ultimately, the Q drops and “the storm” are nothing more than the revelation of the truth that Deep State and their legacy media refuse to present to the American people (and the world). There isn’t anything to stretch, it is plainly evident what has happened and why. We aren’t making anything up. As the saying goes, “you couldn’t make this stuff up if you tried.” The Deep State has done the work for us. Q highlights that these articles were both presented in the legacy media channels on the same day (December 19, 2017) and asks if that was a coincidence. Think about it, Q had only posted 375 of 4953 drops, in less than 2 months. Why would the Deep State already be writing hit pieces on the movement – unless the information was legitimate, and they were trying to get ahead of something / shut it down? Why would they attempt to shut it down if it was just another “conspiracy theory?” I believe I have clearly presented the answer to this question. Q was a legitimate, military operation conducted by Trump and the Patriots, to transfer information / truth to the people outside of the legacy media, who would [never] give it a minute of coverage.
Drops #376 through #380 (https://qalerts.app/):
Q responds to an Anon in drop #376. The Anon re-posts drop #375 and asks if UFOs were a distraction (adding another topic that is typically given a conspiracy theory label). Q responds to the Anon by asking how far away the closest star is from our solar system, which is Alpha-Centauri (~4.25 light years away). Then, Q adds, “what do you think?” I believe Q is clearly stating that UFOs are not a topic of discussion in the Q drops (in this context it is a reference to intelligent life), but rather a distraction used by the Deep State. Q asks this question to cause a critical thinking exercise to take place and ensure Anons had a clear understanding this topic would not be a point of focus in the drops.
To illustrate my point, the probability that we would be visited by intelligent life is massively small (indistinguishable from zero, mathematically speaking). As a thought experiment, let’s consider the following scenario, logic gates, and resulting probabilistic calculation. We will assume a 1% (0.01) chance for each of the elements in the scenario (extremely generous). To be visited by an intelligent life form from our closest galaxy, we would require a scenario (at minimum) where they exist, [and] they are located within the closest galaxy, [and] they have the technology to reach us, [and] they visit our exact location, [and] they complete the journey safely. Using our 1% assumption for each (again extremely generous) and calculating the probability using the logic gates (multiply when you have an AND gate) you would have 0.01 * 0.01 * 0.01 * 0.01 * 0.01 = 0.000000000001 (then multiply by 100 to get 0.0000000001%). When you get probabilities this small, they are considered mathematically indistinguishable from zero. Therefore, it doesn’t matter what you believe on the topic, it isn’t important in these discussions. However, I will note that there are extremely credible reports of Unmanned Aerial Phenomenon (e.g. USS Nimitz) that have happened, but those are likely the various militaries of the world playing with the technologies from WWII. Ultimately, I decided this was important to spend a little time on as shills will push anything in the comment sections (as Q will highlight later). Stay focused!
Q responds to an Anon in drop #378. The Anon re-posts drop #375 and asks if the news stories were proof that the Deep State was working to justify the use of United Nations troops to take over America. Q responds to the Anon by stating that there will be no UN troops (i.e. the Patriots wouldn’t allow this to happen). This doesn’t mean that the Deep State won’t try, you won’t see weird things in the legacy media, and the speculation won’t abound on the internet. What this means is that this is not an area where you should spend a tremendous amount of time, outside of general awareness of the possibility and how it could occur. Again, stay focused!
Q responds to an Anon in drop #379. The Anon asks Q if the operation that was referenced the night before was successful. Q responds to the Anon with “roger that,” which is standard communication terminology used to affirm a statement. Q provides additional information regarding drops #375, #376, and #378, in drop #377. Q explicitly identifies the term “conspiracy” and states that the Deep State would push this heavily (and still do, to this day). Q states that the drops were a BIG threat to the Deep State, for reasons we have discussed. Then, Q states that everything was being monitored / absorbed real time, indicating that the Deep State was using tools to measure which methods were more successful than others at distracting the public / Anons. Q ends the post by telling Anons to be proud. Q responds to an Anon in drop #380. The Anon re-posts Q’s text from drop #378, states that it was a relief that the Patriots were not going to allow UN troops to take over, and references the terrible situation in Chicago. Q provides a future proves past message (still pending) stating that the National Guard will ultimately help remedy the situation. I am confident we are all looking forward to that time frame!
If you have made it to the end, congratulations! I hope you are having a great week! All in all it has been a quiet week. Some interesting points of note you can look into are Biden claiming there WiLl bE aNoThEr pLaNdeMic, more Uvalde information / drama, warnings of blackouts / brownouts due to the summer, Sri Lanka’s economy officially collapsing, and a convenient FDA approval for use of CRISPR Cows for Beef. Key things I am looking for in the next month or so are the official SCOTUS decision on Row v Wade and the resulting violence from the Deep State, the CCP to officially move on Taiwan, additional rate hikes from he Fed, and more downwards pressure on the markets. There are many more irons in the fire, but it seems to me these ones are getting closer to prime time. Shall see what happens. Regardless, this gives you a list of items to check out if you are unaware and want to be better informed. Please check out my podcasts where I am discussing this content, as well as Bitcoin, via audio / video (https://rumble.com/c/PatriotsInProgress). I am also on Truth Social (@PatriotsInProgress). Please show your support by hitting that Re-Truth button to share this content to the masses. Hold the line! God Bless, Patriots!
1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”
Fair Use Notice: This publication / video contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.
Patriots in Progress is my "opinion." Anything said by me, or my guests is either opinion, criticism, information, or commentary. This content is not financial advice. I encourage you to use this as a starting point to do / continue your own research.