All Q Drops – Part 84: Sussman Verdict Got You Down? Q Told Us What to Expect. Interpret the Drops Literally. Trump Tweets About Obama’s Ring Inscription.
Help Spread the Word
Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. Thank you!
How this Works
For each publication, I will review at least one Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.
The Elephant in the Room (Q Proof)
Before we get started, I wanted to take some time to reflect on the recent verdict in the Sussman trial. I understand some of you may feel that this was a letdown and have likely seen the black pills (i.e. negativity / pessimism / hopelessness) flying around the various social media platforms in the comment logs. I want to note up front, that we discussed the possibility of getting a “not guilty” verdict several publications / podcasts ago. This was not a surprise in the least. Next, I would like to share with you a dig I did on this outcome, the other indictments that Durham has made, and Q drop #151. When I reviewed this drop several months ago in the publication and podcast, I made a mental note to keep an eye on both the locations the indictments were made, as well as the outcomes. I believed Q was indicating that winning in DC would be tough, and likely impossible, due to the level of corruption and Deep State control in that jurisdiction. Therefore, when the verdict came out today and it confirmed my suspicions, I decided to put together a dig and use it to provide some encouragement to the Patriots following along.
Q ends drop #151 by asking what the nickname of DC is, which is the swamp. Then, Q asks why sealed indictments would be outside of DC jurisdiction. Q is indicating that the corruption in Washington DC is so bad (judges, prosecutors, politicians, etc.), that sealed indictments were also being made outside of the jurisdiction. This would be important to prevent the variety of tactics that those players would have available to subvert justice (leaks, narrative control, mistrials, jury selection, intimidation, legislation, intervention, public opinion, etc.). Q then points to the speed at which Trump was nominating judges and getting them through the confirmation process. “Donald Trump has appointed and the Senate has confirmed 220 Article III federal judges through November 1, 2020, his fourth year in office. This is the second-most Article III judicial appointments through this point in all presidencies since Jimmy Carter (D)” (https://bit.ly/3oBBgAa).
Now, if you look at the 3 indictments that have occurred thus far, we have Clinesmith, who was indicted in the district of Connecticut, who was found guilty. Next, we have Sussman, who was indicted in DC, who was found not guilty. Lastly, we have Igor Danchenko, who was indicted in the District of Virginia (specifically Alexandria). The outcome of this trial is TBD. I believe this tells an interesting story. Let’s face it, the level of incriminating evidence against all three of these individuals is enormous and more than enough to get a unanimous guilty verdict in any fair court. However, we see Sussman get off. So, what gives? As always, when we critically think through the data, optics, game theory, big picture, etc., we can tell what likely happened. In this case, I believe this was an exposure operation, to show the world that no matter how much evidence you have against the Deep State, you will not get a conviction through DC, at least not at this point. This exposure provides Trump and the Patriots with a tremendous amount of ammunition to use against the Deep State (i.e. truth). Therefore, I believe it is something to keep an eye on as we move forward (i.e. where additional indictments occur, what the verdicts of the various trials are). However, I will also note that this is simply an observation. I am not claiming that we will win every battle in non-DC jurisdictions, however I would expect a much higher success rate. Below my diagram are 2 Truths from Kash Patel (occurred a day after my post) that support this dig.
Drops #317 through #321 (https://qalerts.app/):
Q responds to an Anon in drop #317. The Anon refers back to the drops where Q highlights the leaked pictures from the Christmas event and asks if the “White House Anons” were really the Secret Service and the ones who leaked the photos. The Anon tries to back up the claim by using the amount of people present in the pictures that were leaked and the amount of people at the party, stating that to get those pictures it would have to be after the event. Q wholly refutes the claim by stating to not mistake journalists who were invited to the parties as good guys. Q is highlighting a few important elements of the asymmetrical war that we are fighting and elements that often get overlooked / confuses people to this day. One element is the concept of sometimes keeping your friends close, but your enemies closer. Dr. Fauci is a great example of this concept. Trump put him front and center, shined the spotlight on him, while acting like he wasn’t part of the Deep State (even though Trump knew exactly who he was and what he would do what he would do – a puppet serving his masters). Another element is the concept of maintaining the correct optics to maintain a public narrative. Remember this is an information war that is all about keeping control of the narrative to direct it where you need it to be later. Q is indicating that even if the journalists were Deep State puppets who were intentionally leaking information to attempt to build a narrative against Trump, it was important to keep them around to avoid negative consequences that would be worse for the narrative. If Trump would have banned the legacy media and other Deep State players from being around, the Deep State would have had a field day building a narrative around how Trump didn’t want the “truth reported” and was “banning the press.”
Q responds to an Anon in drop #318. The Anon quotes a lyric from Linkin Park and attempts to link it to Q’s use of the term BREAK. Then they refer to the untimely and suspicious deaths of Chester Bennington from Linkin Park and Chris Cornell from Soundgarden and Audioslave. While those are interesting rabbit holes, Q does not acknowledge the content of the Anons post in the response. Therefore, we will not dig any deeper than that in this publication. Q responds to the Anon by correcting their use of the word “to” (i.e. I’m about “to” BREAK) with the word “the” (i.e. It’s about “the” BREAK). Then, Q states that everything has meaning. Q is indicating that the drops should be read analytically and should not be embellished / taken out of context. The words were chosen carefully and therefore have a specific purpose. Similar to the Bible, when you change a word or use a verse out of context, you can get a whole other set of religions (e.g. the Word was “with” God vs. the Word was “a” god).
Q re-addresses several data points / questions that we have discussed previously in drop #319. Recall the Q drop and Trump Tweet, each addressing the US military, that were separated by 3 minutes. Next, Q re-highlights Obama’s Secret Service code name of Renegade and provides the definition of the word. Lastly, Q points to the Secret Service protection that is provided to former presidents and vice presidents. Q states that they weren’t sure why the drops weren’t being understood by the Anons who were posting on the boards in drop #320. Q reminds Anons to [expand their thinking] and stresses the importance of the activity. Ultimately, I am not sure why they weren’t being understood either. I believe we have made good sense of them thus far, easily, by using open-source evidence / information and not speculating. Did we catch everything? No. However, we can be confident that we didn’t stretch the drops to indicate something that was not intended. Q provides the timestamps of the Q drop and Trump Tweets that addressed the US military in drop #321. Recall that the Q drop was posted at 1:34 PM Eastern and the Trump Tweet was posted at 1:37 PM Eastern.
Drops #322 and #323 (https://qalerts.app/):
Q posts a picture of a Trump Tweet from 2012 in drop #322. We won’t discuss it this time but note that 322 is the number of the Skull and Bones society at Yale, which provides another interesting rabbit hole if you are interested in getting some extra credit. Trump asks why Obama’s ring has an Arabic inscription in the Tweet then links to an article. This article discusses much of what we dug into before but contains some unique, additional information (https://bit.ly/3zi4mLn). Q states that it is the 4th quarter and that we fight together. Q responds to an Anon in drop #323. The Anon re-posts drop #322 and thanks the Q team for all that they were doing. The Anon states that it was the desire of most Anons to help the movement and reflects on how hard it must be for the Q team to be fully aware of the truth and wait while we all wake up. Then, the Anon apologizes. I believe this provides some important perspective that many of us have wrestled with over the journey. We have all, at some level, been frustrated with the situation and having to wait while we allow the rest of humanity to realize the truth of the situation and the gravity of the war. However, we must always remember that there were others who were patient with us while we underwent awakening. It is important to extend a lot of grace. It is not easy to admit that you have been lied to your entire life, you are a cog in a fiat system, the elite are actively planning to implement totalitarian / communist rule, etc. I clearly remember the various parts of my journey and how hard some of these truths were to swallow. Let’s keep that in mind as we move forward. The Anon ends their post by stating that the service of war is selfless in nature, since it is directed to God’s glory and the freedom of all Patriots; and tells Q that they were ready for whatever was needed, whenever it was needed. Q responds to the Anon by stating that the Q team was appreciative of all that the Anons were doing. Then asks God to bless each and every one of us.
If you have made it to the end, congratulations! I hope you have had a great week so far. Hope also that June treats you well. Please stay alert and be prepared. As I have said before, we do not know where this might go, before we see victory. Remember, this is war. Please check out my podcasts where I am discussing this content, as well as Bitcoin, via audio / video (https://rumble.com/c/PatriotsInProgress). I am also on Truth Social (@PatriotsInProgress). Hold the line! God Bless, Patriots!
1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”
Fair Use Notice: This publication / video contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.
Patriots in Progress is my "opinion." Anything said by me, or my guests is either opinion, criticism, information, or commentary. This content is not financial advice. I encourage you to use this as a starting point to do / continue your own research.