All Q Drops – Part 61: How Do You Capture a Very Dangerous Animal? Signal Ahead of Time You Will Be Attacking?

Help Spread the Word

Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. Thank you!

How this Works

For each publication, I will review at least one Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.

Drop #151 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q begins drop #151 by asking questions about the process of attacking / capturing a dangerous animal (also prey, enemy). I believe Michael Saylor (CEO of MicroStrategy, which holds ~125K Bitcoin) answers this question best (indirectly as they were talking about Bitcoin) when he was being interviewed by Robert Breedlove on the “What is Money?” podcast. In the beginning of their series, Saylor is setting the foundation by discussing the realities and dangers of nature (i.e. survival of the fittest / smartest). He uses an example of an eagle hunting by swooping down to push a baby / small mountain goat off the side of a sharply steep hill (where they can be found standing). After the push, the eagle soars around as it watches gravity do all the work by pull the goat downwards, smacking it against any rock that is sticking out at high velocity, until finally the goat comes to rest at the bottom, dead. Only at the end does the eagle swoop down and take / eat its prey. The eagle reaped much reward for a carefully planned and smart strategy / attack.

Next, Saylor uses an example that I believe more directly answers Q’s questions. In this example, we have a pack of wolves, hunting a primitive human (e.g. cave dweller). Saylor describes that the wolves would naturally do things that would help ensure that their prey would end up dead, and their casualties minimized, prior to initiating an attack. Ultimately, Saylor’s conclusion is that the wolves would put together an irregular and asymmetric attack where the wolves would outnumber the human, with some form of [trap] established (surprised, hunted from the back, unfamiliar territory, wolves with the high ground, etc.), and one where the human would be guaranteed to die no matter what actions they took during the attack. Also, the wolves would only put their best wolves on the job, ones that are both able and certain to complete the mission successfully. I believe that Q is indicating that any action against the Deep State would be conducted in the same fashion to ensure both the security of the mission as well as the success.

Next, Q focuses on the actions of Edward Snowden and how that situation potentially worked out in favor of Trump and the Patriots. “During his years of IT work, Snowden had noticed the far reach of the NSA's everyday surveillance. While working for Booz Allen, Snowden began copying top-secret NSA documents, building a dossier on practices that he found invasive and disturbing. The documents contained vast information on the NSA's domestic surveillance practices” (https://bit.ly/35Oc17c). Some Anons suspect that this information was leaked intentionally to both expose Deep State actors who were using this technology against normal citizens within the National Security Agency and allow other Deep State actors to begin using similar tactics / software. If this software was adopted outside of the NSA, it would give the NSA an advantage over the users since they had the intimate understanding of the software and likely had more advanced software at the time of the leak (i.e. why would you leak your best, if it was an intentional leak?). Regardless, this activity helped identify personal data and privacy as a serious and growing concern for the world and expose the intentions of the Deep State to implement an increasingly powerful surveillance / police state.

Then Q focuses on the public optics of Jeff Sessions. “Donald Trump selected Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions in December 2016 to run the Justice Department, calling him a ‘world-class legal mind.’ After Sessions recused himself in March 2017 from decisions related to the investigation of Russia's meddling in the 2016 election, Trump began a yearslong series of attacks on him” (https://bit.ly/3B6UB1e). Although this may seem bad on the outside (i.e. from a public, mainstream narrative perspective), Q points us to the extreme opposition that Jeff Sessions received during the confirmation hearings. “Senator Jeff Sessions was confirmed on Wednesday as President Trump’s attorney general, capping a bitter and racially charged nomination battle that crested with the procedural silencing of a leading Democrat, Senator Elizabeth Warren” (https://nyti.ms/3ryxfyy). This indicates that he was the right person for the job and was considered a significant threat by the Deep State. This would not be the only time we would see this kind of open exchange between Trump appointees as time went on (e.g. Milley, Rosenstein, Barr). Q first states in drop #2643 that, “optics are important.” Q also states here that “nothing is as it seems,” Therefore, it is important to recognize that just because it is reported one way, doesn’t mean it occurred that way. It takes a lot of research and critical thinking into the statements, actions, perceived intentions, attacks against, etc. of the various players, often over a long period of time, to really understand what happened.

I encountered some synchronicity today with this topic / my publication and a Telegram post from IET 17 (t.me/InevitableET), that mentioned a few of these players and how shill accounts continue to expend ammunition against them to paint them as “black hats,” regardless the amount of work Anons have done to understand the truth (i.e. “white hats”). IET 17 also explains why some of these players tend to be confusing relative to the operational strategy and their true role / intentions. Ultimately, as with everything, I will present the data as we move through the drops, and you can decide.

Then Q briefly mentions the vastly different confirmation hearing experienced by Rod Rosenstein and why that might be relevant. In April of 2017, “the Senate voted 94-6 Tuesday to confirm Rod Rosenstein as deputy attorney general. Rosenstein will be in charge of overseeing the investigation into Russia’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election, including potential connections between Trump campaign officials and Moscow.” “Top Democrats, who announced their support for Rosenstein this week, signaled that they think Rosenstein will ultimately side with them” (https://bit.ly/3uBhTuP). As we discussed above, the potential implication of Rod Rosenstein being a white hat would be significant (due to the large Deep State support and belief he was on their side). Ultimately, I consider everything we see as a very complex game with extremely unique rules that have been allowed to be manipulated / broken over time to create the “house rules” of the Deep State. Therefore, certain actions must be taken players publicly to give a certain impression to the other side / public, regardless of what is truly the case. It all goes back to the mainstream narrative control and public opinion discussion.

Next, Q discusses the return leg of Trump’s trip to Asia and the DC Swamp. First, Q asks why Trump left Manilla ahead of schedule. I believe that these types of moves would provide allowances for Trump to hold clandestine meetings (e.g. in Pyongyang with Kim Jong Un on a tarmac), without disturbing the major itinerary significantly (i.e. provide cover). Significant disruptions would be identified by the Deep State and likely weaponized against Trump (e.g. projection of Trump / North Korea collusion to have a nuclear war). Then Q discusses Trump’s return to Hawaii, refueling Air Force 1, and why that might be relevant. “President Donald J. Trump is expected to stop over at Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam for an Air Force One refueling stop Tuesday morning enroute to Washington D.C. following a 12-day trip to Asia” (https://bit.ly/3rzpHvd). Although Air Force 1 has the capability to refuel in-flight, it is a risk that can be avoided and minimizes the operational team around Trump. Trump would stop to re-fuel on other occasions as well. This stop in Hawaii would have allowed him to re-engage with the US Pacific Command [in person], potentially provide intelligence / updates on the Asia trip and any clandestine operations, as required.

Q ends the drop by indicating that the corruption in Washington DC was so bad (judges, prosecutors, politicians, etc.), that sealed indictments were also being made outside of the jurisdiction. This would be important to prevent the variety of tactics that those players would have available to subvert justice (leaks, narrative control, mistrials, jury selection, intimidation, legislation, intervention, public opinion, etc.). Q then points to the speed at which Trump was nominating judges and getting them through the confirmation process. “Donald Trump has appointed and the Senate has confirmed 220 Article III federal judges through November 1, 2020, his fourth year in office. This is the second-most Article III judicial appointments through this point in all presidencies since Jimmy Carter (D)” (https://bit.ly/3oBBgAa). Ultimately, this is an important step towards completing the long-term strategy of saving our country, and seeing justice, from the hands of the Deep State.  

Drop #152 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q replies to an Anon in drop #152, who posted a picture of what was outside the window of Air Force 1 during a video that Trump Tweeted, which highlighted some of the key public moments during his Asia trip (

https://qagg.news/?read=P32460

). The Anon asks if anyone was taking a closer look at the video. Q encourages the Anon to dig by stating the picture was curious and asking, “what’s below?” Doing some digging many agree, due to the peculiar river (large, S / hairpin curves) and road (big, cutting across the river perpendicularly to the before splitting on one side / turning sharply on the other side), the picture is of the Taedong River running through Pyongyang. This potentially indicates that Trump held clandestine meetings with Kim Jong Un in Pyongyang during this trip to Asia (recall that North Korea was a talking point, not a destination for this trip). I believe this makes sense as we saw the mainstream narrative / theatre around the North Korea situation play out and Trump ultimately being successful in negotiating a historic peace agreement between North Korea and South Korea. I believe this further backs up the assertion that North Korea was a black site for the CIA and Kim Jong Un was being blackmailed, threatened, pressured to take certain actions in the region. Recall that Q has said, “nothing is as it seems.” Note: I do not believe AF1 would not have been able to fly over Pyongyang like that unless it was expected and approved by North Korea and the entire diversion hidden from the Deep State. Note also: Q asserted that the CIA attempted to install geo-positioning software on Trump’s Twitter account when it was taken down prior to the trip (i.e. they were worried about Trump doing clandestine activities they had no insight into and wanted to track him). The two graphics below provide topographical representations of Pyongyand and the Taedong river that can be compared to the Q drop.

If you have made it to the end, congratulations! Hope you all are having a great week so far! If you haven’t already, please check out my podcasts where I am providing this content, as well as some Bitcoin education, via audio / video (https://rumble.com/c/PatriotsInProgress). Hold the line! God Bless, Patriots!

1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”

Fair Use Notice: This publication / video contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.

Patriots in Progress is my "opinion." Anything said by me, or my guests is either opinion, criticism, information, or commentary. This content is not financial advice. I encourage you to use this as a starting point to do / continue your own research