All Q Drops – Part 32: Trump Tweets Hidden Approval for Saudi Arabian Deep State Takedown

Help Spread the Word

Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. Thank you!

How this Works

For each publication, I will review one or more Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.  

Drop #71 (https://qalerts.app/):

Drop #71 continues to build on the bigger picture Q has been painting. I’ll continue to summarize the questions we have addressed before, while specifically addressing the new questions or providing additional data I find interesting. We have established that Huma Abedin is an important Deep State player to follow. Huma and her family have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and Saudi Arabia. Q asks who the Muslim Brotherhood are. Simply, you can pull up the definition as, “an Islamic religious and political organization dedicated to the establishment of a nation based on Islamic principles. Founded in Egypt in 1928, it has become a radical underground force in Egypt and other Sunni countries, promoting strict moral discipline and opposing Western influence, often by violence.” The Muslim Brotherhood have been involved in places like Syria and Libya. Note that they call themselves “Muslim” Brotherhood but have goals of spreading “Islamic” principles. Why the disconnect? In my opinion this is just another example of Deep State players intentionally putting wolves in sheep’s clothing (infiltration) for some larger goal, in this case division, destabilization, disinformation, hate, radicalism, terrorism, etc. “Islamism is not a form of the Muslim faith or an expression of Muslim piety; it is, rather, a political ideology that strives to derive legitimacy from Islam” (https://www.washingtoninstitute.org/policy-analysis/muslims-vs-islamists). Islam is anti-Semitic, anti-Israel, anti-American, etc. If you are able, think back to the various arguments around this topic during the Obama administration (e.g. he wouldn’t say “Islamic Terrorism,” development and push of “Islamophobia”).

Next, Q brings in another player with both a list of crimes and connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. “Thirty-seven-year-old [Imran] Awan, as well as his wife and two brothers Abid and Jamal, worked as IT administrators for nearly 30 congressmen, all Democrats, including former Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman-Schultz. They did not have security clearances and it is not even certain that they were in any way checked out before being hired” (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-strange-case-of-imran-awan/). “It has also been revealed recently that the Pakistani IT staffers were sending sensitive information to the Muslim Brotherhood.” (https://canadafreepress.com/article/california-swamp-ca-democrat-house-members-hired-muslim-brotherhood-awan-br). Q then asks about the location of the Awan Group’s offices. “Awan Group of Companies is a large and diverse organization with current operations in Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, Malaysia, United Arab Emirates and the newest addition China and United States of America” (

https://www.awangroups.com/

). Another note I found, “Aswan’s wife, Hina Alvi, was also in the family business of being paid by Democrats. She had already fled the country with her three young daughters. The Awans had fraudulently acquired a $165,000 loan from the Congressional Federal Credit Union, and sent it home to Pakistan” (https://ethicsalarms.com/2020/12/11/the-rest-of-the-story-about-the-imran-awan-scandal/). Ultimately, Q is indicating that this is another cesspool of Deep State corruption (money laundering, unauthorized transfer of classified information, etc.). In December of 2020, “The House of Representatives quietly paid $850,000 this year to settle wrongful termination claims by five Pakistani-American technology specialists, after a set of routine workplace allegations against them morphed into fodder for right-wing conspiracy theories amplified by President Trump.” Surprising?

Next, Q asks about the connections between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia. The history is rich, but an Anon lead me to the following which demonstrates a more recent arrangement. “The bilateral relationship has grown further since Pakistan joined the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism (IMAFT). The IMAFT, created by Saudi Arabia in December 2015 to combat Daesh and other terror groups” (http://www.arabnews.com/node/1072611/saudi-arabia). As most will recall easily, Pakistan has been used by the Deep State repeatedly over the years (e.g. conflicts with Israel, aiding terrorism, weapons smuggling). Therefore, it is no surprise that there would some level of connection between their individual Deep State factions (when mutually beneficial, blackmail dictates a desired action, etc.). Then, Q asks why Saudi Arabia gives large donations to senior US politicians and what they receive in exchange. Although the specific answers vary depending on the situation, the general answer is political favors. Basically, if the Deep State gives you money / favor, they will want something in exchange at some point, which will likely increase their investment (they likely aren’t losing money when conducting deals, unless it is strategic) and benefits the Deep State in some fashion (e.g. business deals, foreign policy decisions, turning a blind eye to corruption, protect their vast control on oil).

Then, Q indicates Hillary lost power in this relationship when she lost the 2016 election. Saudi Arabia had provided payments to Hillary to help fund her political war machine, but when she lost, she no longer had access to the White House to make good on her promises. Therefore, Obama had to make good on the re-payments by sending the cash pallets to Iran under the pretense of a hostage trade. However, if you look at their history, Saudi Arabia and Iran not had a great relationship. “The latest escalation in tensions between Iran and Saudi Arabia has set off alarm bells across the globe. There is a real fear that failure to repair the rupture in this relationship could lead to a worsening of the already dire humanitarian crisis in Syria, further destabilize a perilously volatile region, and even impede the battle against ISIS” (https://www.mei.edu/publications/too-big-fail-iran-saudi-relationship). Therefore, Q making the North Korea connection in this context, implies that to make good on the Hillary’s re-payments to Saudi Arabia, Obama had Iran divert a portion of the cash to North Korea in some fashion deemed acceptable by Saudi Arabia. Applying this same thought process, any money Iran diverted to ISIS would have likely also qualified to repay Hillary’s debts.

Next, Q asks questions around the transition of power in Saudi Arabia by asking who Abdullah bin Abdulaziz was. Simply, he was the previous King of Saudi Arabia. “The royal court said in a statement on Friday that Abdullah, believed to be around 90, died” (23 Jan 2015) (https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2015/1/23/king-abdullah-of-saudi-arabia-dies). After the death of King Abdullah, “King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud acceded to the Saudi throne” (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-30945925). Then Q recalls Saudi Arabia’s reception of Trump vs the Deep State. Most interestingly, in my opinion, Q points out the Tweet below, which we discussed previously, and asks if it was supposed to be direction to someone and why that might be relevant. As Aramco is one of the big Saudi Arabian Oil companies, I believe Q is indicating that Trump was giving a nod of approval (i.e. not condemnation, which we all know Trump would have done if he had disapproved), letting their government officials know that he approved of the action and would keep their interests in mind regarding the global oil stage down the line. “Coincidentally” on the day they took down some Deep State players. “Coincidentally” after Trump alluded the same games would not be played once elected. “Coincidentally” days after Q begins posting and dropping clues about Saudi Arabia. This also served as a message to the Deep State players that Trump and the Saudi Arabian government had established a new set of rules in the area. Note also that this the first time Q indicated that Trump’s Twitter could potentially be used for hidden communications (i.e. he didn’t say “Great job taking the assholes down!” in the Tweet below). This is another important decode methodology.

Next, Q asks what attack happened prior to these actions. “Saudi Arabia says it has intercepted a ballistic missile fired from Yemen, after a loud explosion was heard near Riyadh airport on Saturday evening” (https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-41872995). As for the location of Trump when the Tweet was sent, he was likely in Pearl Harbor, getting ready to travel to Japan, but was possibly enroute. Then, Q asks what US operators were in Saudi Arabia. I believe these questions indicates that these were Deep State missiles, targeting Patriot assets in Saudi Arabia (or even Trump?). Q ends the post by stating that the questions asked are done so purposefully. By doing so, the Q team helped identify the existence of these answers, identify the connections of these topics, and lead Anons to construct the big picture of what was / is going on.    

If you have made it to the end, congratulations! This was another one of those tremendously dense drops. I highly recommend you spend some time on this one and ensure you understand what Q is telling us through the questions and research. Hope you have a wonderful rest of the week! Tomorrow is Friday! Hold the line! God Bless, Patriots!

1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”