All Q Drops – Part 26: Trump and the Saudi Arabian Sword Dance
Help Spread the Word
Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. Thank you!
How this Works
For each publication, I will review one or more Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.
Drops #57 and #58 (https://qalerts.app/):
Drop #58 is a combination of new information presented in drop #57 and previously discussed information presented in drop #56. Therefore, I will discuss the new information presented in drop #57. First, Q points out the harsh criticism that No Name and others provided when Michele Bachman and others warned of the potential connections between Huma and the Muslim Brotherhood and the potential infiltration of America. “Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) vigorously defended top State Department official Huma Abedin, who is Muslim-American, against allegations by Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) and other conservatives that she is part of a Muslim Brotherhood conspiracy to infiltrate the U.S. government.” “These attacks on Huma have no logic, no basis and no merit," McCain added. "And they need to stop now” (https://www.huffpost.com/entry/john-mccain-michele-bachmann-muslim_n_1683277). This is relevant because it shows that No Name and others were intentionally allowing this infiltration to take place, either through explicit actions (e.g. Huma being so closely tied to Hillary and the State Department, providing protection / cover for these players) or implicitly by allowing it to progress without explicit resistance (e.g. RINOs who talk a big game, but always cave to the Deep State when it is action time).
Q then points to someone who made an undisclosed trip to Saudi Arabia. It is likely that Q is referring to the undisclosed trip Jared Kushner had taken to Saudi Arabia in late October 2017. “President Donald Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner returned home Saturday from an unannounced visit to Saudi Arabia — his third trip to the country this year” (https://www.politico.com/story/2017/10/29/jared-kushner-saudi-arabia-244291). Q then asks what the purpose of a face-to-face meeting would be versus a phone call. Most importantly a face-to-face meeting helps eliminate the possibility of a digital communications trail. Ultimately, all emails, texts, Tweets, etc. can be retrieved, even if they have been “deleted.” Therefore, so long as the trip logistics are controlled (e.g. undisclosed, private travel itinerary), and the location of the meeting is in a secure location (e.g. Secure Classified Information Facility), one can be fairly confident that the information discussed at the meeting would be limited to the participants who were present and could not be intercepted by digital surveillance. Q again ends the drop with Alice (Hillary) and Wonderland (Saudi Arabia).
Drop #59 (https://qalerts.app/):
Q begins drop #59 by comparing the Saudi Arabia visits of Hillary, Obama, and Trump. First, Q asks how Trump was received by Saudi Arabia. “President Donald Trump received a lavish welcome and briefly joined Saudi King Salman in a traditional male-only sword dance before a state dinner at Saudi Arabia's Murabba Palace.” The following is a video of the unique reception (
). This sword dance is known as an “Ardah.” “The most common Ardah in Saudi, called the Najdi Ardah, was initially performed by Arab warriors in the central Najd region of Saudi before meeting their enemies on the battlefield. Sword dancing was a way for the men to display their weaponry and show their heroic spirit” (https://www.visitsaudi.com/en/do/culture/sword-dancing-in-saudi). I find the timing and symbolism / meaning very interesting, based on the timing of the Q drops, the indications Q provided regarding Trump and the Patriots effort to take down the Deep State, the times Trump has referred to himself as a “wartime President,” etc. Next, Q asks how Obama was received by Saudi Arabia. “US president’s [Obama’s] low-key arrival and meeting with King Salman underscores tension that has deepened over US policy towards Iran and the war in Syria” (https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/apr/20/barack-obama-saudi-arabia-visit-king-salman-relationship). Next, Q asks how Hillary was received by Saudi Arabia. Hillary was provided the same treatment as Obama, per what I was able to dig up from other Anons. However, I cannot access the one article I could find that supposedly confirms these claims (I refuse to subscribe to mainstream media outlets for information). If you are interested, you can potentially view the article for free (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/15/world/middleeast/16tent.html). Q asks Anons to consider the relevance in this difference in treatment. This difference in treatment indicates that Saudi Arabia had trust / respect for Trump but had distrust / disrespect for Obama / Hillary. This also indicates that although Hillary and Obama were very powerful Deep State players, the Deep State players in Saudi Arabia were more powerful (otherwise they would have received them well). Trump would see similar receptions in many nations around the world. Remember, he has claimed many times that “we caught them all.” Remember also, Trump is not a politician in the traditional sense. He is not a part of the Deep State, although he has had to operate within their system and in proximity to their players his whole life. They used to love the Trump when they thought they could ultimately control him. I mean, how many times did they speculate and ask him if he was going to run for office in his earlier years?
Q provides additional insight and guidance regarding the drops and their content in the second half of drop #59. First, Q states that the posts are intended to be analyzed together. Therefore, I tend to weigh the confidence in an interpretation, Q proof, Q-incidence, etc. higher if it can be supported by multiple, independent drops. Ultimately, the drops are not describing a bunch of disjointed topics. They describe a complex Deep State system, the actions of the Deep State players, the consequences of their actions, their intentions for the future (the playbook), and provides clues regarding the Patriot’s intended response. The drops contain, and will lead you to, a significant collection of information. Q then states that the flow of information had been changing from one controlled exclusively by the Deep State system to one controlled by We the People (around the world). In previous publications we discussed how the Deep State players didn’t fully appreciate the capability the internet would give the People to both find and disseminate information, even with the increasing censorship / opposition. Therefore, the system the Deep State has implemented, and controls is limited in various ways (e.g. backchannels exist). Q states that the change in the flow of information is the reason the Q team was spending “critical” time dropping the “crumbs” (drops / information / questions) on the boards. It was our job to take the information to others via “red pills.”
Q then points out how Trump had worked to label the mainstream media as “fake news.” This was relevant because it created a truthful brand around these players / organizations and caused many to re-consider their consumption of information as we progressed through the years (some turned it off entirely, some got more selective, some are still plugged into the system – each as they hit their personal “precipice”). This exodus in viewers was important as it gave rise to alternative media and independent journalists / news sources (e.g. podcasts, blogs, interviews, Anons). Next, Q states that the Q team was prepared for social media to be shut down / censored (e.g. POTUS Twitter removal). I consider this statement a Q proof, as we have since witnessed both the removal of Trump from all social media platforms as well as the mass censoring of anything that goes against the Deep State narrative. Q then indicates that various countermeasures were in place to protect against these potential actions. It is important to note that the following Tweet, which I pointed out for a different reason in a previous publication, had not yet happened when drop #59 was released.
If you have made it to the end, congratulations! Hopefully you are starting to feel smarter about the drops, the history, the Deep State system, etc. I had a tremendous amount of fun thinking through and writing this publication. There is a lot packed in these two drops! Hope you all have a great end of the week. It’s almost Friday! Hold the line! God Bless, Patriots!
1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”