All Q Drops – Part 187: Soap Operas, Accessing Hollywood, and “Pet” Names. You Can’t Imagine the Size of This. We’ll Need Citizen Journalists.

Help Spread the Word

Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Hitting the re-TRUTH button on TRUTH Social is the best way you can make an impact and help get this message out! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. You can find me @PatriotsInProgress. Thank you!

How this Works

For each publication, I will review at least one Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.  

Drops #1210 through #1213 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q re-posts drop #1209 in drop #1210 and provides the signature AS THE WORLD TURNS. This signature has multiple meanings, many of which we have discussed previously. Q re-posts drop #1210 in drop #1211 and provides a link to a CBS article on Agnes Nixon from September 28. 2016. “Agnes Nixon, the creative force behind the popular TV soap operas ‘One Life to Live’ and ‘All My Children,’ has died.” “Nixon created, wrote and produced the long-running ABC daytime serials” (https://tinyurl.com/3dk83e3c). If you recall previous discussions, you will remember this signature is also the title of a Soap Opera, written by Agnes. “She began her career in soaps working for Irna Phillips. Under her tutelage, Nixon was a writer on Woman in White and As the World Turns, and was head writer for Search for Tomorrow, Guiding Light, and Another World” (https://tinyurl.com/2s4hk6d4). If you dive down this rabbit hole you will uncover that these types of shows are often used to gatekeep access to Hollywood, with most (if not all) actors / actresses getting their debut on one of the platforms (not limited to the ones listed).

To put that a different way, these platforms can be used as a vehicle of vetting, where actors / actresses can be pushed to compromise themselves in increasing ways to get additional access (e.g. a better role in a movie production). Those who do not play, do not last. Those who do play, see their careers progress to greater heights. Chris Paul and Burning Bright explained what Chris refers to as the “party of false decorum” very well when they reviewed the movie “Eyes Wide Shut” on Story Hour (https://tinyurl.com/ncacrz4y). The concept in the movie being that players are presented with increasingly compromising situations and their access is determined by how many they choose to participate in. Stormy Patriot Joe and Absolute1776 did a fantastic job compiling the Hollywood data, shortly after the announcement of Matthew Perry’s death, as it related to various drops / players / topics (e.g. Obama, Wendy, Agnes) on Eye of the Storm (https://tinyurl.com/2vny4ae9). I highly recommend you review both if you want to better understand this series of drops and the information provided by the Q team. Remember, everything is connected, and the map is extremely complex / interconnected. Much more detail than I can provide in these publications alone is necessary to get a full understanding, which is why I am very grateful for the many Patriots within our movement who are digging, compiling, and sharing the truth!

Q re-posts drop #1211 in drop #1212 and provides a hint that the previous picture provided, of Obama and “Wendy,” was of Obama and Maggie (her real name). Q makes this connection explicitly and asks Anons how many pictures they could find of the two of them together. Q ends the drop by detailing that these pictures spanned over many years (i.e. Maggie at age 10, 11, 12…). Q responds to an Anon in drop #1213. The Anon responds to drop #1212 and asks if Obama had been “diddling” Maggie since she was 10 years old. Q responds by providing a photo (see below) of the two of them from Instagram (from account 3_ringcircus), highlighting the portion of the comments that provides her name (Maggie Nix[on]) and her age at the time (10). As always, I will let you decide. Q ends the drop by emphasizing the data that could be pieced together were all open source.

Drops #1214 and #1215 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q responds to an Anon in drop #1214. The Anon re-posts drop #1213 and asks why searches for “Maggie Nixon” and “Obama” returned an image of Abramovic and DeFranco ONLY (i.e. search results were being filtered, hidden, and / or data was being scrubbed from the internet) and states that must’ve meant they were over the target. Q responds to the Anon by re-emphasizing the corruption was bigger than anyone can imagine, points to Allison Mack’s indictment, and expresses this was a warning shot given to the Deep State by Trump and the Patriots, that would only snowball as [they] continued to play. Q asks why Hussein was pictured with the Hollywood child many times, asks what “pet” names are, and rhetorically asks if it was all a conspiracy.

It is important to understand, at this point in the drops / history, that many people were still coming to terms with, or had not seen, things like Pizzagate, NXIVM, Epstein Island, etc. The legacy media were working overtime to label and classify anyone talking about these issues as “QAnon” conspiracy theorists and the censorship complex was working overtime to hide, obfuscate, and remove content, as well as shadow ban, censor, and ban those talking about the issues. As for the Hollywood child piece, if you search for Maggie Nixon, you can find her IMDb page and see that she had roles in Fear and Loathing in “Las Vegas,” “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” “The Greenbook,” and wrote / directed “Guadalupe White Sharks” (https://tinyurl.com/2w782tf9). The following article, posted on October 23, 2023, makes some interesting notes about her history (https://tinyurl.com/3aht94r3). As for “pet” names, Merriam-Webster (and the other dictionaries) defines them as “a name that a person uses for someone to show love or affection.” I will also add that the term “pet” indicates a relationship of ownership.

• “About her birth, we know that she was born and raised in the United States of America but there isn’t much information about her birthday.”

• “From assuming her age looking at her recent pictures, she looks to be in her late 20s.”

• “Being popular and at the beginning of her career, she hasn’t still reached to get herself a wiki-bio.”

• “Furthermore, she likes to keep her private life secret which is why we don’t have any information about her relationship details like either she is single or dating her boyfriend.”

• “Similarly, she hasn’t shared any information about her parents and other members of the family.”

• “Following privacy issues, she isn’t available on any kind of social media.”

Q responds to an Anon in drop #1215. The Anon posts a screenshot of an Instagram post (from account ginnygrenham), circles two of the players, and indicates it was Maggie’s mother with James Alefantis (the pizza man himself). For some background, “James Alefantis is an American chef and restaurateur. He founded and owns two restaurants in Washington, D.C., including the pizzeria Comet Ping Pong, and American restaurant Buck's Fishing & Camping. He is also the president of the art gallery Transformer in Logan Circle, Washington, D.C. In 2012, GQ named him one of the 50 most powerful people in Washington, D.C.” (https://tinyurl.com/pfckep26). If you do some digging, you can find Facebook posts (see below), which mimic the photos, players (e.g. Ginny Grenham), and themes (e.g. Maggie’s age, Obama, Time Flies), that indicate Maggie’s mother is Sarah Guinan Nixon. Q responds to the Anon by re-emphasizing the magnitude of corruption, states that this connection was “too close” (i.e. conspiracy risk) and indicates future would prove past (i.e. more planned for the future). Not long ago, Jordan Sather put out a refresher post (see below) that provides a video I recommend watching for additional background into the Pizzagate topic (https://t.me/WeTheMedia/95041).

Drops #1216 through #1219 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q responds to an Anon in drop #1216. The Anon re-posts a graphic (that I could not recover) from another Anon three times and asks if Snowden was talking about the boards. Regardless, looking at his April Tweets, I believe the following Tweet is the most likely candidate. Snowden references an article discussing actions taken by Google to strengthen the censorship complex and points out that it was specifically targeting “people trying to reach uncensored news and chat.” “App developers won’t be able to use Google to get around internet censorship anymore. The Google App Engine is discontinuing a practice called domain-fronting, which let services use Google’s network to get around state-level internet blocks.” “Domain-fronting allowed developers to use Google as a proxy, forwarding traffic to their own servers through a Google.com domain. That was particularly important for evading state-level censorship, which might try to block all the traffic sent to a given service” (https://tinyurl.com/4znnszst). Q responds to the Anon by emphasizing the world was watching, a familiar signature, and one that comes up from time to time. Trump used this signature a little while back in a Truth post (see below_ when pro-Bitcoin, anti-Central Banking candidate, Javier Milei, became President of Argentina. Make Argentina Great Again!

Q provides a link to a Wikileaks email in drop #1217 (https://tinyurl.com/3bsrd2yk). Q responds to an Anon in drop #1218. The Anon re-posts drop #1217 and extracts an excerpt from the email where Huma and several others are discussing their good relationship with Maggie Haberman of Politico, how they have successfully used her to “tee up stories” in the news cycle, and how they could leverage that connection (and potentially others), to run damage and narrative control for Hillary as they prepared for the 2016 campaign cycle. Q responds to the Anon by adding (possibly also a Soros connection as “+” is used) another excerpt from the email where the group acknowledges if they continued their agenda, without countermeasures, it would matter / hurt them in the eyes of public opinion.

It is easy to see in this statement that the legacy media is weaponized to [prevent] organic thought process amongst the population and [steer] public opinion towards a desired agenda. Q ends the drop by emphasizing that this is done through FAKE NEWS, pushed via the 4am talking points, by the legacy media, whenever there is BAD NEWS for [THEM]. Standard operating procedure. Q re-posts drop #1218 in drop #1219 and connects what was being done (past, present, and future) to the efforts Sessions had undertaken against leaks / leakers. Q ends the drop by encouraging Anons to expand this beyond the simple leaking of data and emphasizes this is a violation of fundamental ethics and standards in journalism. Hence the need to replace the legacy media with a decentralized network of citizen journalists. We are the news now! Handle with care!

If you have made it to the end, congratulations! I hope you have had a wonderful week. For my perspective on current events and how they relate to the Q drops, please watch Eye of the Storm and Rugpull Radio on Badlands Media! Things are absolutely wild right now with no indications it will slow down anytime soon! Please show your support by subscribing and sharing the content. Hodl the line, relinquish nothing, advance when possible! God Bless, Patriots!

• Catch up on the latest Rugpull Radio episodes!

• Catch up on the latest Eye of the Storm episodes!

1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”

Fair Use Notice: This publication / video contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.

Patriots in Progress is my "opinion." Anything said by me, or my guests is either opinion, criticism, information, or commentary. This content is not financial advice. I encourage you to use this as a starting point to do / continue your own research.