All Q Drops – Part 146: WHY School Shootings? It’s Always About the Money. Phase [2]. What is More Precious Than Our Children?

Help Spread the Word

Please subscribe, like, and share with others! Hitting the re-TRUTH button on TRUTH Social is the best way you can make an impact and help get this message out! Let’s build a community of Patriots and make progress together. You can find me @PatriotsInProgress. Thank you!

How this Works

For each publication, I will review at least one Q drop and discuss at a high level. There is a vast amount of data out there that I cannot not hope to capture in these publications. Therefore, I encourage each of you to independently research the data and come to your own conclusions.  

Drops #815 through #818 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q provides a photo of the Broward County Sheriff, Scott Israel, and Hillary Clinton in drop #815. This sheriff was in charge of public optics and managing the narrative / fallout after the Parkland shooting. Q asks Anons if they believe in coincidences. Q continues to flesh this out in drop #816 by asking why the Deep State uses school shootings to push their agenda. The answer is that crises involving children elicit some of the strongest emotional reaction possible. Unless you are evil, no one wants to see harm come to an innocent child. Therefore, shooting a bunch of children works well to push the Deep State agenda and clog the news cycles. Q asks why the local players would go along with these sick events. Q answers this question through the kill box, stating local police, school, county officials, etc. are blackmailed, coerced, threatened, etc. to behave in certain ways, or risk losing their jobs (and even their lives).

Q further clarifies that federal funding and donations are the primary angle that is used to force local players into compliance (i.e. don’t do what we say – funding will get cut, do what we say – we will make a special donation). To provide some sauce, Q provides a link that looks at where the federal aid from the Sandy Hook shooting went. As you will see, while some money went to helping student mental health, the majority of what was spent went to public relations, lobbying, and salaries (with half of the money raised still unallocated). Q reminds Anons it is always about the [fiat]. “The mother of one of the 20 children killed two years ago said trying to get help has been at best confusing, and at worst impossible, for many families.” “$45 million, in total, has flowed into Sandy Hook in the last two years. About half of the charity money has yet to be spent.” “Through Freedom of Information requests,” “An analysis of those records shows” (https://bit.ly/3FooT2T):

• “The United Way spent almost half of the $131,355 it received from a DOJ grant to hire the lobbying firm of Gaffney, Bennett and Associates to handle public relations. The Sandy Hook Foundation used $122,000 of federal money to hire an executive director.”

• “More than $618,000 of that is going to hire at least four full-time staffers, including a community outreach liaison with a salary of $110,000, a project manager at about $73,000 and a case manager at about $61,000. The second group, a non-profit called the Resiliency Center of Newtown, is getting $501,000 from the second DOJ grant; of that, $408,000 is for salaries, including $82,000 each to hire an art and music therapist, records show.”

• “One of the education grants paid for more than 40 new school-system positions.” “Several new positions were created to oversee the grant.”

• “For the first year, the Yale Child Study Center and Clifford Beers Clinic provided mental health services within the school. Clifford Beers has now become the sole provider.”

Q responds to an Anon in drop #817. The Anon includes two screenshots from Breitbart News articles which discuss the actions by the local deputies during the shooting. From what I can tell, these are the same article (i.e. initial headline changed to second headline). The Anon provides a link to the article for further information. “One deputy resigned after it was learned that he was on scene but failed to control Nikolas Cruz. Sheriff Israel told ABC 13 that video shows the deputy, Scott Peterson, ‘arrive at the west side of Building 12’ and ‘take a position’ outside the school — but never go inside.” “Three other Broward County deputies were outside the school but failed to go inside as well.” Coral Springs officers said, “deputies had their pistols drawn and were behind their vehicles” and “not one of [the deputies] had gone into the school.” “Coral Springs police were stunned and upset that the four original Broward County Sheriff’s deputies who were first on the scene did not appear to join them as they entered the school” (https://bit.ly/3JACmat). As usual with unfortunate events turned false flags to push the Deep State narrative, this whole thing stunk to high hell. If you are unfamiliar with the shenanigans, this is a good story to dig into, as it was widely discussed at the time.

Q asks Anons who they thought was leaking information. I believe this is two-fold, with the Deep State leaking information (classified and unclassified) convenient to their narratives, and the Patriots leaking information (unclassified) that provided Anons with appropriate facts to counteract the false narratives. Q refers to the concept of MK Ultra by telling Anons to analyze the shooter and his mental health. Per previous discussions, “Henderson Behavioral Health, an independent organization, told DCF that [Nikolas] Cruz was receiving mental health treatment services and that he was taking medication” (https://bit.ly/412Gl6p). Q indicates Patriots were working actions behind the scenes and this event further implicated / set up entities like CNN.

Q reposts drop #817 in drop #818. Q states that libel laws would be the end of the legacy media. Looking at the definitions, “libel is a written statement which wrongly accuses someone of something, and which is therefore against the law” (noun) and “to libel someone means to write or print something in a book, newspaper, or magazine which wrongly damages that person's reputation and is therefore against the law” (verb) (https://bit.ly/3LeVZWO). Q is indicating that the media would become increasingly responsible for damages caused by their defamation and slander. This process has been recently illustrated by the efforts of Nick Sandmann and Kyle Rittenhouse to sue and win settlements against various legacy media entities for libeling them. As we know, the legacy media has not changed their tactics and the landscape is ripe for others to do the same. Not saying this will happen but think about how much the media has libeled one man, Donald Trump, and the damage he could inflict, if necessary.

Drop #819 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q responds to an Anon in drop #819. The Anon posts both a screenshot of the board feed, which includes drop #797 with “phase [2]” highlighted (and a meme), and a Tweet from Zero Hedge that points to an article discussing Trump making a public reference to Phase 2. “After unveiling the ‘heaviest sanctions ever imposed on a country before’ against North Korea earlier in the day, President Trump told the gathered media that the US will go to ‘Phase 2’ if those sanctions do not have the desired effects of denuclearizing the Korean peninsula.” “’If the sanctions don’t work, we’ll have to go phase two,’ Trump said. ‘Phase two may be a very rough thing, may be very, very unfortunate for the world. But hopefully the sanctions will work.’ The president did not specify exactly what he meant by 'Phase 2' and qualified the statement saying that he didn’t think he was ‘going to exactly play that card’” (https://bit.ly/405q3YY). The Anon asks Q if it were a coincidence. KEK. Q responds that it was not and tells them to expand their thinking. This is yet another solid example of the close connection between the Q drops and Trump’s Tweets / statements.

Drops #820 through #826 (https://qalerts.app/):

Q responds to drop #819 with a SEC TEST in drop #820. Q provides another SEC TEST (with a D3 label) in drop #821. Then, Q provides a stringer in drop #822, indicating they were running real time logs for the previous 15 minutes, which capture the vulnerability Q highlights next. Q provides a message to Code Monkey, who as we discussed secured / protected the boards as an admin / owner. The Q drop directs Code Monkey to search the software for an embedded string of software code that occurred earlier that evening (i.e. 7:03 PM EST) and points out that it was causing 7 different warning messages to be displayed. Q indicates the attack would require brute force and provides 2-minute warning for going dark. Q provides a message that they were going dark (i.e. COMMS_OFF) in drop #824. Early the next day, Q provides another SEC_TEST in drop #825. Lastly, Q provides a message indicating a successful test and states that communications were good. Q ends the drop by telling those who were attacking the board, “nice try.” Remember, our enemies [never] relent and they attack from every angle possible!

If you have made it to the end, congratulations! I hope you have had a wonderful week. For my perspective on current events and how they relate to the Q drops, please watch Eye of the Storm and Rugpull Radio on Badlands Media! Things are absolutely wild right now with no indications it will slow down anytime soon! Please show your support by subscribing and sharing the content. Hodl the line, relinquish nothing, advance when possible! God Bless, Patriots!

• EOTS #33: https://rumble.com/v2va1mr-eye-of-the-storm-ep-33-tue-1030-pm-et-.html

• Rugpull Radio #36: https://rumble.com/v2voztu-rugpull-radio-ep-36-thur-1030-pm-et-.html

1 John 4:5-6 (NKJV) “They are from the world and therefore speak from the viewpoint of the world, and the world listens to them. We are from God, and whoever knows God listens to us; but whoever is not from God does not listen to us. This is how we recognize the Spirit of truth and the spirit of falsehood.”

Fair Use Notice: This publication / video contains some copyrighted material whose use has not been authorized by the copyright owners. We believe that this not-for-profit, educational, and/or criticism or commentary use on the Web constitutes a fair use of the copyrighted material (as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. If you wish to use this copyrighted material for purposes that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Fair Use notwithstanding we will immediately comply with any copyright owner who wants their material removed or modified, wants us to link to their web site, or wants us to add their photo.

Patriots in Progress is my "opinion." Anything said by me, or my guests is either opinion, criticism, information, or commentary. This content is not financial advice. I encourage you to use this as a starting point to do / continue your own research.